Wednesday, May 30, 2012
10 Important Questions to Help Identify High Potential Leaders
10 Important Questions to Help Identify High Potential Leaders
Posted by Dario Priolo on Fri, Oct 14, 2011
According to research from the Corporate Executive Board, 40% of internal job moves made by people identified by their companies as "high potentials" end in failure. Many organizations make the mistake of looking simply at ability when assessing an employee for a management job. Think of the hot-shot sales rep or the genius software engineer. It is incredible how often high producing individuals get promoted into management jobs that require a totally different mindset to be successful.
The reason these people fail often comes down to three critical factors: leadership behaviors, aspiration and engagement.
Aspiration entails whether the candidate really wants the position and is willing to make the sacrifices it may require.
Engagement involves the employee's commitment to the company and its mission. In focusing on whether an employee potentially can do a job, many organizations neglect the question, “Does he want to do this?"
Defining the characteristics can be a tricky proposition, particularly with young employees. The characteristics people develop through training, experience and progress in their activity are not necessarily apparent from who they are when they start. Moreover, many managers have beliefs about leadership that look like something out of a movie -- loud, aggressive, in-your-face types of guys.
Organizations should develop leadership competency models based on a set of traits and behaviors associated with success in the company and then measure employees on how well they do relative to those traits. Organizations need to be sure they are assessing employees not just for the present but for the future, looking at not only what has made people successful, but also what is likely to be important and what shortages they have.
John Bradford, Profiles Senior Vice President of Training and Consulting Services, explains how assessments support the employee lifecycle.
The 10 questions below, along with an effective assessment program, will help you more effectively identify high potential managers:
Does this person have a proven track record for accomplishing impressive results – not just meeting expectations?
Does this person take charge and make things happen? Or sit back and let things happen before producing?
Does this person inspire confidence in his or her decision making?
Can this person lead through persuasion and influence? Can he or she serve as an effective sounding board to others who are struggling with complex issues?
Do others trust this person to lead projects and teams, even though he or she doesn’t have a leadership title?
Does this person have an understanding of how to separate “what” from “how”? An awareness that establishing the destination before deciding on the mode of transportation is essential?
Can this person keep a global perspective? Are priorities apparent, or does she or he become mired in the details and tactics?
Do obstacles stop this person? Or do they represent challenges, not threats?
What success has this person had with multitasking?
How do unexpected changes affect this person’s performance?
http://info.profilesinternational.com/profiles-employee-assessment-blog/bid/74838/10-Important-Questions-to-Help-Identify-High-Potential-Leaders
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Comments
ReplyDeleteGood performers are normally rewarded with a promotion. But promoting every performer to a managerial role may not be correct. That's why advanced companies prefer dual ladder concept one for technical ladder and one for leadership ladder. very valuable list of questions but I will choose potential for decision making , persuasiveness ,influencing skills, change management , ability to communicate across all levels as important. thx
Posted @ Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:36 PM by siva sankaran
Gauging leadership potential based on how someone performs in the past is not necessarily indicative of future performance; it is at best a gamble. More important may be reliableness, which is based on long term performance; this goes not only with people, but with products we make. Today, senority and reliability are not in focus, since we keep believing our youth have all the answers, and the elderly just need to lie down and die.
Posted @ Monday, October 24, 2011 8:46 AM by Daniel Greenleaf
According to research literature, the best predictors of future behaviors are one's past behaviors.
Not many organizations track this performance domain explicitly, but rather implicity through the company's corporate culture.
Hiring done outside of the company usually cannot access this very important feature of an applicants work personality. You pay your dime and you take your chances.
Ergo, develop both technical and operations leadership from within through effective succession planning.
Posted @ Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:55 PM by Deer Stand
Just because a person has worked on the factory floor, does not mean this person automatically is right for management roles or authority positions.
From my experiences working in this countries airline industry, I was employed under a management team that were quite inexperienced and basically managed as they went along?
Not to say that you can't progress from the factory floor, as I discovered that 'attitude' and 'belief' was what you needed!...Leadership behaviors, aspiration and engagement as you mention were qualities missing from my employment place. Managing by deception was how I viewed it, and I believe others out there in the business & employment industry try and survive this way as well?...Yet unfortunately honesty always has a last say on things!...'Listen, understand and respond'.
Posted @ Monday, December 12, 2011 6:00 PM by Tai Lemalu